Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard shooting himself in the foot

His anti-oil bias threatens the future economic stability of his province

Download this column on Quebec and Philippe Couillard for your publication or website. FREE with coupon
Terms and Conditions of use

Contact Gwyn

VICTORIA, BC Jul 7, 2015/ Troy Media/ – TransCanada Corp.’s 4,600 kilometre Energy East Pipeline would carry Alberta crude oil to Middle-Eastern import dependent refineries in Quebec and New Brunswick. Last November, the Quebec government declared that, for the pipeline to cross the province, it must generate economic benefits. Then on June 23, Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard told reporters that he didn’t see much economic value for his province in being a “transit place” for the pipeline.

New Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant was quick to respond, “The province of Quebec is . . . estimated to receive . . . about 4,000 jobs . . . an increase of about $3 billion in the GDP and, on top of that, about $700 million in extra tax revenue . . .” he said. Given the size of those economic benefits and that they are roughly twice those that would accrue to Gallant’s own province, Philippe Couillard’s statement is indeed baffling. Perhaps it’s simply a matter of the anti-oil bias he illustrated later in the interview, “I prefer a world without fossil fuel, only electric, you know”.

Alberta’s decline will lead to decline in Quebec 

Alberta is, of course, Canada’s biggest fossil fuel producer, and most dependent on the success of the Energy East project. But what Couillard fails to recognize is that a decline in Alberta’s economic fortunes also poses an indirect threat to his province’s own financial sustainability. Why? The answer lies in the structure of the Federal Equalization Program.

A province’s Equalization Entitlement is based on the amount by which its “Fiscal Capacity” is above or below the average of all 10 provinces (known as the “10 Province Standard”). Those falling below that average are commonly referred to as “have-not” provinces. Quebec has received an equalization grant every year since the program was established in 1957. And since Ontario became a have-not province in 2009; BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland/ Labrador have been the only net contributors to federal equalization funding.

Philippe Couillard doesn’t seem to understand how equalization works

Alberta has long been the province with the highest Fiscal Capacity and, indirectly through Ottawa, the largest supporter of equalization. But now, Alberta is in serious economic trouble. A Conference Board of Canada report released in January concluded that 2015 will see the province experience the largest drop in GDP, together with a reduction of some $12 billion in business investment. Events in the six months since the report make that outlook decidedly optimistic. TransCanada has been forced to defer the planned start-up date for Energy East, pushing badly needed global oil market access into 2020. The world oil price outlook has become even more unclear. And the surprise victory of Rachel Notley’s NDP Party in Alberta, elected on a platform of higher income and carbon taxes together with a “review” of royalty rates, has fostered further waves of layoffs and deeper investment cuts.

The Conference Board report estimates that oil producers in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador will see a combined $10 billion reduction to their revenues this year. It will almost certainly be worse than that. Equalization grants only flow when the Fiscal Capacity of some provinces is above that of others. So what if the Fiscal Capacity of these three “have” provinces were to drop? Simple arithmetic would result in a reduction in the 10 Province Standard, thereby drastically reducing equalization payments to the have-not provinces. What if this happens to “fossil-fuel” shunning Quebec?

Equalization grants in peril

That province’s deficit for the fiscal year ended March 31 was $2.35 billion after receiving a $9.29 billion federal equalization grant. Without that grant, Quebec’s deficit would have ballooned to $11.64 billion. Given that Quebec’s debt/GDP is already the highest of any Canadian province and 2.5 times that of the most indebted American state, the Philippe Couillard government would have no choice but to implement drastic spending cuts. The “Quiet Revolution” that brought in the so-called “Quebec Model” welfare state so revered by the provinces’ political, union and intellectual elite would turn into a raucous and wrenching upheaval.

The impact of reduced equalization grants would also be wrenching for the Maritime Provinces. The difference is that New Brunswick Premier Gallant understands the vital importance of the oil and gas industry to Canada’s economic and social fabric, and is wisely doing what he can to help sustain it.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired Canadian business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

Read more Gwyn Morgan

Troy Media Marketplace © 2015 – All Rights Reserved
Trusted editorial content provider to media outlets across Canada
Terms and Conditions of use Get Help FAQ

Submit a Letter to the Editor

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

You must be logged in to post a comment Login