Wynne’s cap and trade system a boon for Quebec

The net effect of Ontario’s Cap and Trade system may well be the export of jobs from Ontario to Quebec

To download Wynne’s cap and trade system a boom for Quebec for your publication or website click here

Contact Gwyn

VICTORIA, BC, May 7, 2015/ Troy Media/ – Last month’s announcement by Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne that her province would link up with the existing Quebec and California carbon dioxide Cap and Trade systems prompted an editorial in the Globe and Mail headlined, “Is this Green Energy Act Round Two?”

Ontario’s Green Energy Act offered so-called “feed in rates” almost four times existing electricity rates for wind and more than 10n times for solar power. Like bees to honey, wind and solar companies rushed in. By the time the government realized that these subsidies were driving Ontario from one of the lowest to one of the highest power cost jurisdictions in North America, the province had signed myriad 20-year locked-in rate guaranteed contracts that will drive power rates up a further 40 to 50 per cent in coming years.

Cap and trade another self-inflicted wound

Adding salt to this self-inflicted wound is the reality that much of the green power comes on stream when it isn’t needed. This unneeded electricity is dumped into the U.S. at bargain basement prices that Ontario’s Auditor General found has already cost Ontario power consumers billions of dollars, with much bigger losses yet to come before those 20 year contracts expire.

cap and tradeGiven these disastrous results, one would think that Wynne and her cabinet colleagues would have carefully studied experience in other jurisdictions before implementing green policy two. The first and largest carbon Cap and Trade scheme is Europe’s 10-old system. As in Ontario, the story begins with huge subsidies for wind and solar power that drove up electricity prices precipitously. Cap and Trade handed wind and solar power companies a second windfall by creating a “carbon trading market” that allowed them to sell “carbon offsets” from their low-emission projects. On the other hand, many factories and industrial plants, already struggling with high power costs, found it more profitable to shut down and sell their carbon credit allocation in the carbon trading market.

As a result, the bulk of Europe’s emissions reductions have been achieved by the departure of energy intensive industries to overseas locations. Many of the products consumed by Europeans are now produced in countries without emissions limits, demonstrating the futility of imposing local carbon cap measures without global commitments. And since European industry was already among the world’s most energy efficient, the emissions embedded in most of those imported goods are higher than when the same goods were produced domestically.

Adding irony to this job-exporting fiasco, some European countries, including Germany, have implemented subsidies in an effort to keep the remnants of their industrial sector from shutting down. German electricity consumers paid some €20 billon (C$26.7 billion) in green power subsides last year while at the same time their government spent billions of Euros to help industrial plants survive the combination of high electricity and Cap and Trade costs that made them uncompetitive in the first place.

The Ontario announcement has promulgated a debate as to whether Cap and Trade is a tax. Clearly, for those having to buy carbon credits, it amounts to a tax. But for those who have credits to sell, it amounts to a subsidy. But what most commenters have missed is that former Premier Dalton McGuinty’s Green Energy Act created what is, for practical purposes, an indirect tax on energy consumers.

Now comes Wynne’s equally ill-considered Cap and Trade tax. In mirror image to the Europe’s green power driven levy on electricity consumers followed by Cap and Trade, Ontario’s ill-considered green scheme number two could strike the final blow that drives industry elsewhere.

Quebec comes out a winner

This leaves the question as to why Quebec so warmly welcomed Ontario’s decision to join their Cap and Trade system. Quebec’s electricity comes almost entirely from cheap, emissions-free hydropower, mitigating much of the competitive impact of Cap and Trade. Quebec has just announced a massive expansion of its hydropower capacity and is looking for markets. The net effect of signing Ontario onto its Cap and Trade system may well be the export of jobs from Ontario to Quebec businesses and the export of electricity from Quebec to Ontario consumers, along with the added bonus of selling carbon credits to Ontario businesses unable to meet Cap and Trade targets.

Ontario generates just 0.5 per cent of global carbon emissions. Even a giant 20 per cent reduction would knock just a 10th of 1 per cent off global emissions. A miniscule gain for the globe, at a potentially enormous cost to the people of Ontario, and all Canadians.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired Canadian business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

Read more Gwyn Morgan

Follow Gwyn via RSS

Troy Media Marketplace © 2015 – All Rights Reserved
Trusted editorial content provider to media outlets across Canada

Submit a Letter to the Editor 12345 Click here to report a typo or inaccuracy
Use all of our content for one low monthly fee
Unlimited Access Subscriber? Not yet a Subscriber?
Choose your circulation
Flat fee for websites/others

You must be logged in to post a comment Login