Reading Time: 4 minutes

By Avram Denburg
and Wendy Ungar
Hospital for Sick Children

The Ontario government’s decision to invest in universal drug coverage for those under 25 is a long-needed policy commitment that will help ensure the health of our next generation.


Avram Denburg

As a pediatric oncologist, Dr. Denburg sees children every day who struggle to gain access to the medicines they need. These range from those for serious common conditions such as asthma, to those for rare but chronic or life-threatening conditions like cancer.

A major barrier to access is cost.

Canada is an outlier for not having a universal program for prescription drugs for children and for allowing wide inter-provincial variation in how public drug plans serve children. This means many families can’t afford the essential medicines their children need to get healthy and grow up healthy.

One in five Canadians foregoes taking prescription medicine due to cost.

Essential medicines are crucial for children, not only to treat issues now, but to help ensure they can grow and develop to their full potential. In terms of bang for buck, it’s hard to argue with investing in the health of children: curing and caring for children will maximize their chances of growing into the healthy, productive citizens who define our future.

Wendy Ungar

Universal prescription drug coverage for children would save money now and in the future. In the short term, a universal, public system would reduce drug costs through the increased purchasing power that comes with bulk procurement. In the long term, Canada would benefit considerably from the developmental gains reaped by healthy children.

Reliable and sustained access to necessary medicines is crucial to control childhood diseases such as asthma, diabetes, cancer and immunologic disorders. Optimal disease management improves survival and minimizes late effects. This lays the foundations for a healthier and more productive society.

But more needs to be done.

This budget commitment by the Ontario government is a step in the right direction but it is just a first step. It won’t solve all the problems of drug access in Canada and not even in Ontario – neither for children and their families, nor for the millions of adults who struggle to pay for the drugs their doctors prescribe.

For children, careful attention will need to be given to which drugs are covered and which aren’t, and why. How to deal with novel drugs for childhood illness is a crucial part of this.

As an oncologist, Dr. Denbrug witnessed the enormous promise of new drugs for hard-to-treat cancers in children first-hand. Many of these therapies could increase the chance of cure and reduce the horrible side effects of traditional chemotherapy. Frequently costing thousands of dollars a year, such specialized medicines for rare and often life-threatening pediatric diseases impose a financial burden that no family should be left to bear alone.

Unfortunately, our systems for deciding which drugs to cover publicly are not well set-up for children. Careful study of persistent gaps in drug coverage and access, and of the policies governing which drugs are selected for public coverage, will be very important to understanding the success of Ontario’s policy.

A universal pharmacare plan for children must also be thoughtfully integrated into our healthcare system. Beyond improved access, such a plan has the potential to maximize the safety of pediatric drug use. How?

Off-label prescribing of drugs for children – when a physician prescribes a medication to treat a condition or an age group different from that for which it is approved – remains a significant problem, due largely to gaps in evidence. Universal public drug coverage can promote prescribing in line with pediatric guidelines, and could encourage the development and organization of evidence in areas where knowledge gaps persist.

And let’s think bigger. To truly capitalize on its potential benefits – to the health of Canadians and our healthcare system – pharmacare needs to be universal and national.

National pharmacare for children would harmonize coverage across provincial jurisdictions. This could spur the development of a national evidence base for rational use and funding of pediatric medicines. And that would result in enhanced drug safety and efficacy for all Canadian children.

Starting with kids is a politically pragmatic, economically sound and morally defensible first step toward universal pharmacare. Now we need to study and scale it.

From Ontario’s lips to the feds’ ears.

Dr. Avram Denburg is a staff physician and clinician scientist in the Division Hematology/Oncology at the Hospital for Sick Children. Wendy Ungar is a Senior Scientist in Child Health Evaluative Sciences at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto and a Professor in Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto.

Avram and Wendy are Troy Media contributors. Why aren’t you?

© Troy Media

universal pharmacare

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.