Bill 39 would allow a mayor to pass laws with the support of only one-third of council
The Ford government introduced Bill 39 in an attempt to break the gridlock often experienced by city councils in Toronto and Ottawa. The major reason Ford introduced the legislation is to prioritize the speedy approval and construction of new housing in some of Ontario’s most dense communities.
The bill’s main feature is that it gives the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa so-called strong mayor powers.
On the surface, the bill looks promising. Bill 39 would allow mayors in Toronto and Ottawa to have more control over appointments and in establishing priorities for council. It would also give those mayors more control over the budgetary process. Allowing mayors to set priorities and have more control over the council’s agenda could, in theory, help with the housing issue.
|Ford right to battle for government employee wage restraint
|Ford needs to end the Metrolinx fiasco
|Ford should be bold and cut the sales tax to counter inflation
|KEEP AN EYE ON ONTARIO
But that’s where the good parts of the bill end.
The most dangerous element of Bill 39 is that it would allow the mayor to pass laws that only receive the support of one-third of council.
In a democracy, allowing just one-third of council, if aligned with the mayor, to pass any law under the sun is extremely dangerous.
From Ford’s perspective, this bill also makes little sense. Right now, John Tory is the mayor of Toronto and Mark Sutcliffe is the mayor of Ottawa.
Both men appear to be amenable to parts of Ford’s agenda.
But, in theory, both mayors could also hold the province hostage. Imagine a scenario in which a duly elected mayor and a small minority of councillors choose to pass policies that directly counter provincial priorities.
Not too long ago, David Miller, as mayor of Toronto, pushed through some of the largest property tax hikes in the province’s history.
If Miller had only needed the support of one-third of council to raise property taxes, tax hikes could have soared. Instead of a 10 per cent hike, homeowners could have been looking at a 20 per cent increase.
The need to win the support of a majority of councillors is critical in ensuring that extreme policies don’t turn into ill-fated laws.
Ford claims Bill 39 is democratic. According to the premier, voters duly elect mayors, so giving them more control over the agenda isn’t undemocratic.
Giving mayors more of a say in setting the agenda is a good thing. But there’s a reason that we don’t elect municipal dictators. We elect councillors to help shape the agenda, allow for more diverse voices at the table, and ensure that every corner of the city is represented at city hall.
Handing one-third of council the power to pass any law they want so long as they have the mayor’s backing is minority rule. In no other democratic institution in Canada do we allow a minority of elected representatives to impose an agenda opposed by a majority of elected officials.
If he finds this new mayoral power system successful, Ford plans to extend these powers to municipalities across the province. It isn’t only democracy in Toronto and Ottawa that is at stake – Ontarians all across the province have a stake in this fight.
Bill 39 needs a fundamental rewrite. Today, mayors all across the province don’t have enough power and influence. Ford’s desire to give them a stronger voice is sensible. But allowing one-third of council the ability to hold the cities of Toronto or Ottawa hostage is a major mistake.
Jay Goldberg is the Ontario & Interim Atlantic Director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
For interview requests, click here.
The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.
© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.