North American energy choices leading to disaster

Climate change fanaticism led to Putin's War

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Ian MadsenA few weeks ago, there was a violent First Nations-climate extremist attack on a Coastal GasLink natural gas pipeline construction site in British Columbia.

In a seemingly unrelated development, German leaders decided last year to rapidly phase out nuclear energy with nothing to replace it.

Also last year, the United States chose not to approve two pipelines.

These three major events in energy politics were propelled by the global warming crusade, which seeks to end the production and use of fossil fuels.

A powerful green campaign against resource extraction and transportation has left Canada and the United States with very limited energy options, options that are getting fewer as time passes.

In addition, the world is becoming increasingly dependent on unsavoury regimes – such as Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq – for natural gas and oil.

While climate activists and their allies in militant First Nations may cheer when oil or natural gas assets in North America remain undeveloped, the world demand for energy remains high and is satisfied by sales from antidemocratic regimes. Of course, the low production in North America aids them in selling their resources.

No matter what happens in the U.S. and Canada, fuel is still produced and consumed, with limited influence from those governments that only indulge the ‘net-zero’ fantasies of virtue-signalling crusaders in North America and other Western countries.

Also, increasingly these products are transported by trucks and trains because fewer pipelines are being constructed, greatly increasing environmental and safety risks.

The result is that Western nations are increasingly dependent on unstable, unreliable, and despotic nations and regions for these resources. All of the autocratic states producing large quantities of oil and gas are undemocratic and repressive, with less reliable rule of law or environmental protection than Canada, the U.S. and European nations with the potential to produce oil and gas.

Clearly, human rights are less important to the crusader activists than their goal of ‘climate justice’ in the consuming nations.

In 2020, the United States was net energy independent and supplied other countries with refined oil and natural gas. Hydraulic fracturing and other techniques that unlock the potential of shale and other ‘tight’ formations produce prodigious quantities of natural gas and oil. But since 2020, production has declined rapidly as permits expired. More wells need to be drilled, but the U.S. government of President Joe Biden is opposed to this.

The moratorium imposed by the Biden administration on drilling lease sales on federal lands has drastically reduced potential U.S. output. Also, the cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline and the court challenges facing the Dakota Access line limit exports from Canada, so more Canadian oil can’t enter the U.S.

It’s time to invest in Canada’s energy sector by Tim McMillan
Canada can supply oil and natural gas to world markets for decades, while driving down emissions and bolstering our economic recovery

Meanwhile, in Germany, the panicky decision to end nuclear power meant increasing reliance on wind and solar power and, ironically, on coal and natural gas when wind and solar energy fail to satisfy demand. As well, German dependence on the mercies of Russian President Vladimir Putin previously led Germany to approve the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, a decision it recently rescinded, reversing its reliance on Russia.

The recent spike in oil and natural gas prices in North America has resulted from the restrictions on production in the U.S. and Canada. This has, unfortunately, filled Russia’s coffers with massive foreign currency reserves because the cost of oil and gas has increased internationally, giving Putin the resources he needed to invade his neighbour.

This was foreseeable, as similar energy price increases preceded the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008 and the invasion of Crimea and the Donbas in 2014.

These are the geopolitical effects of obstructing and penalizing the North American energy production and supply systems. Climate fanatics wish for global net-zero use of fossil fuels, but dictators like Putin seek to satisfy the energy needs of many nations while boosting their cash, and thus fund their militaries.

The future doesn’t look promising for Canada and the U.S. unless they change their attitudes and strategy quickly.

Ian Madsen is the senior policy analyst at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Ian is a Troy Media Thought Leader. For interview requests, click here.


The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.

© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.