Shunning the unvaccinated just another kind of discrimination

Vaccination passports will restrict the rights of a minority of people to access services

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Jack BuckbyBritish Prime Minister Boris Johnson revealed in May that he would establish an agreement on creating a universal vaccine passport system with the G7 countries – including Canada. He told CBC News that nations require “agreements” on “COVID status certification and the rest.”

Johnson was referring to how travel and passports will work as the world leaves lockdown, signalling his belief that restrictions should be implemented on travel for those who refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

It’s just one more example of the Conservative British PM, famous for his traditionally liberal values, adopting an authoritarian approach to COVID.

It’s also part of a wider, disturbing trend of pressuring people already hesitant to take a vaccine to set aside their concerns no matter what.

Download this editorial content for your publication or website

While some vaccines are already required for international travel, there’s no other example of a vaccine that’s required for individual citizens to travel domestically, interact with businesses and pay for products or access services required to live a normal 21st-century life.

Not only do vaccine passports pose a number of extremely serious ethical questions, but they may also be entirely unnecessary.

The majority of people want the vaccine and are willing to take it. In the United Kingdom, out of a population of 66 million, some 39 million had received the first dose of the vaccine by the end of May, with plans in place to offer the vaccine to people of all appropriate age groups by the end of July.

In Canada, over 50 per cent of the population received at least one dose of the vaccine by the end of May, with results from a Canadian Community Health survey taken between September and December 2020 revealing that 76.9 per cent of Canadians were somewhat or very willing to take the vaccine.

The idea that a full reopening of national economies is put at risk by a significant number of people who don’t want the vaccine is simply wrong – and at this stage, it seems Western governments are more bothered about making people comply than they are about opening their economies fully. It begs the question of whether this is some kind of power trip or a misguided sense of duty to protect people.

This isn’t your typical anti-vax argument. On no occasion is it ever right for the government to tell a person what to do with their body. But even the pressing matter of stemming the rate of infection and protecting people is an entirely different conversation now, given that huge portions of the population have either been infected with the virus or received at least the first dose of a vaccine.

In the same way that United States President Joe Biden insisted that the White House wasn’t working on a COVID vaccination program but didn’t rule out allowing private industry to adopt a similar system, the British and Canadian governments may adopt a system that doesn’t force individuals to take the vaccine but makes life so difficult that they soon reconsider it.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has indicated that Canada would align with international allies on vaccine passports, indicating that an agreement at the G7 is all but done.

No matter the argument on individual rights and civil liberties, the very nature of vaccination passports indicates that the rights of a minority of people to access services, make purchases and even travel will be restricted or removed entirely unless they comply.

The message that “you don’t have to get it, but we protect the rights of businesses to deny sale or service to people who don’t” doesn’t fly. Civil rights movements fought against precisely this kind of discrimination.

When faced with the possibility of being unable to live a normal life without taking the vaccine, being unvaccinated is not truly a choice.

Take the news that a concert in St. Petersburg, Fla., will charge $18 for vaccinated attendees and $999.99 for the unvaccinated and ask yourself how the government would react if those price discrepancies were applied according to other characteristics like religion or race.

The vaccination efforts in the United Kingdom and Canada are hugely impressive and have laid the groundwork for a safer reopening of national economies and achieving herd immunity.

Ending lockdowns before vaccines were available is a very different story than lifting restrictions now that a majority of people have at least been offered the first dose of the vaccine. Over a year since the pandemic began, now would be the time for our governments to allow people to make their own decisions about their health.

But unless a G7 leader is willing to stand up to these vaccine passport plans, it’s likely that, before the end of the year, our leaders will establish an inferior class of unvaccinated citizens unable to live their lives like everybody else.

Jack Buckby is a research associate at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Jack is a Troy Media Thought Leader. For interview requests, click here.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the authors’ alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.

© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.

Jack Buckby

Jack Buckby is a research associate with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and a British author and researcher, with experience working in English, American, Canadian and Polish media.

2 Responses to "Shunning the unvaccinated just another kind of discrimination"

  1. mel   September 4, 2021 at 7:50 am

    It is discrimination when unvaccinated people have to show proof of negative covid test to enter concerts and other venues and vaccinated people do not have to show proof of negative covid test for admittance to same venue.

  2. Russell scott   July 22, 2021 at 2:28 pm

    Thank you for providing a voice to those who have given some intelligent thought about whether or not to get the vaccine whose long term safety has not been established and has only been conditionally approved. More and more do I see journalist columns vilifying those who have decided to exercise their constitutional rights over choosing what they decide to put into their bodies. The anti-vaxxer labelling of those who are concerned about the unproven long-term safety of the vaccines is just another form of racism with a different label. The vaccine passport will turn these people into second-class citizens with unequal rights.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.