The era of the state-run casino monopoly is dead
The road forward: Both Canada and the U.S. are proving that a regulated, competitive online gambling market is the only durable path to consumer safety and tax revenue.
Image by Viktor Ustinov
The online casino has turned into one of the more revealing case studies in how two neighbouring countries handle the same consumer product. In the United States, the decision to allow real-money internet gambling sits with each state, and the national map has filled in one legislature at a time. In Canada, the same question runs through the provinces, and most of them have answered it in a way that looks almost nothing like the American approach. The outcome is two regulated markets that sell a very similar experience yet were built on foundations that have little in common.
For a Canadian reader trying to make sense of the American side, the sheer number of moving parts is the hard part. Rules, tax rates, and the roster of approved brands change from one state line to the next, which is the whole reason running trackers exist. US-focused guides such as PlayUSA, which keeps a state-by-state record of legal online casino platforms and the operators cleared to run them, are useful precisely because no single national rulebook does that job. That patchwork is the honest starting point for any comparison with Canada.
None of this is abstract for provincial policymakers up here. Ontario opened a competitive online gambling market in 2022, Alberta is about to become the second province to follow, and the rest of the country is watching to see whether the American design or the homegrown one holds up better over time. What follows sets the two systems next to each other and looks at what each one gets right, where each one leaks, and what the next few years are likely to bring.
Two countries, two blueprints for the same product
The core difference is constitutional, and it shapes everything downstream. In the United States, gambling policy defaulted to the states, so each one writes its own law, licenses its own operators, and sets its own tax. A brand that runs a legal casino in one state has no automatic right to operate across the border in the next. Companies apply market by market, tie their online licence to an existing land-based property in most cases, and pay a tax on gross gaming revenue that can look very different depending on where they set up.
Canada arrives at the same product from the opposite direction. Under the Criminal Code, provinces are the bodies allowed to conduct and manage gaming, which for decades meant a single government-owned platform in each province and nothing else that was legal. British Columbia players use PlayNow, run by the provincial lottery corporation. Quebec has Espacejeux through Loto-Quebec. The model is a public monopoly rather than a private licensing race, and until recently that was simply how online casino gambling worked across the country.
So the American question is which companies a state will let in, while the Canadian question has long been whether a province will let anyone in at all beyond its own house brand. That single distinction explains most of what the two markets look like today.
How the American map filled in, one state at a time
New Jersey moved first among the larger states, launching regulated online casinos in 2013 as a lifeline for its Atlantic City operators. Pennsylvania followed in 2019, Michigan went live in early 2021, and smaller programs took hold in West Virginia, Connecticut, Delaware, and Rhode Island. Rhode Island was the most recent to switch on, opening its market in 2024 and becoming the first new real-money online casino state in roughly three years.
The pace since then has been slow, and that surprises people who assume legalization is a wave that only rolls one way. Writing a sports betting law turned out to be far easier politically than writing an online casino law, partly because casino gaming pulls revenue away from physical properties and the jobs attached to them. Maine passed iGaming legislation tied to its tribal operators in 2025, with the framework taking effect early the next year, and states such as Massachusetts and Louisiana have kept the debate alive without crossing the finish line. The count of states with live real-money online casinos still sits in the single digits, and every addition has been a hard-fought bill rather than a formality.
Keeping competition out of the market doesn’t protect you. It just guarantees you have nowhere to go when your data and money vanish.
Image by Viktor Ustinov
What all of this means for an outside observer is that American expansion is real but uneven. The market grows through political fights in individual capitals, not through a single national decision, and progress in one state tells you very little about what the state next to it will do.
Why “legal” means something different in every state
Because each state wrote its own law, the word legal carries different weight depending on the map pin. New Jersey and Michigan let a wide field of commercial and tribal operators compete, which produces a crowded menu of brands. Delaware runs a far more limited program routed through its lottery. Tax rates swing widely, from the high teens in some states to rates that take a much larger cut of operator revenue elsewhere, and those numbers shape how generous the promotions and payout tables end up being for players.
Licensing is tethered too. In most states, an online casino brand cannot simply appear on its own. It has to attach itself to a physical casino licence, which means the number of possible operators is capped by the number of land-based properties willing to partner. This is one reason the American market, for all its size, is not the free-for-all that outsiders sometimes picture. It is a set of separate, tightly bounded markets that happen to share a language and a border.
For Canadians, the practical lesson is that any US figure needs a location attached to it. Revenue, choice, and consumer protections are not national traits. They are state traits, and they can differ sharply within a single afternoon’s drive.
Canada took the scenic route through its Crown corporations
For most of the online era, Canada’s answer to online casinos was a public one. Each province offered a single government-run site, kept the revenue inside public accounts, and treated any private competitor operating from offshore as a grey-market outsider rather than a licensed participant. The upside was tight public control and a clean revenue line for provincial budgets. The downside was that a large share of players simply used international sites anyway, sending money and data outside any Canadian oversight.
Ontario broke from that pattern in April 2022. Instead of defending a monopoly, the province set up a licensing agency and invited private operators to enter a regulated, competitive market, bringing many of the offshore brands players already used into a system with local rules. Industry watchers who have followed how Canada’s online gambling market took shape tend to point to that Ontario decision as the turning point, because it proved a Canadian province could run an American-style open market and collect meaningful tax from it.
The results have been hard to argue with on paper. Ontario’s regulated market generated roughly C$4 billion in total iGaming revenue in 2025, up about a third year over year, with online casino games making up the large majority of that total. The province has now passed more than C$10 billion in cumulative operator revenue since launch. That is the number every other province is now staring at.
Alberta becomes the second door to open
Alberta is the province acting on what Ontario demonstrated. Its legislature passed the iGaming Alberta Act, known as Bill 48, in the spring of 2025, and the province has set a regulated market launch for the summer of 2026. The design deliberately copies the Ontario template. A provincial agency will conduct and manage the market while a separate body handles operator registration, mirroring the split between the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and its online arm.
The motivation is the same one that pushed Ontario, only sharper. Estimates suggest that unregulated operators capture something close to 70 percent of Alberta’s current online gambling activity, with the government-run PlayAlberta site holding only a slice of a market players were already using through offshore brands. Opening a licensed market is an attempt to pull that activity back inside provincial rules, capture tax on it, and attach real consumer protections to it.
As provinces shift from public monopolies to competitive online gambling models, the regulatory landscape for Canadian players is undergoing its most significant change in decades.
Image by Viktor Ustinov
Alberta has also tried to learn from what Ontario left unfinished. The province plans to have a centralized self-exclusion tool running before the market opens, a safeguard Ontario has still not fully delivered years into its own program. That detail matters, because it signals that the second province through the door is treating player protection as part of the launch rather than a problem to solve later.
The money side, compared
Putting the two systems in a single frame makes the contrast easier to hold in your head. The table below lines up a few American states against the Canadian provinces that have moved, using recent public figures and each jurisdiction’s basic market design.
| Jurisdiction | Who runs the online casino market | When real-money online casino began | Recent revenue signal |
| New Jersey | Private operators licensed by the state regulator | 2013 | Internet gaming win about US$2.9 billion in 2025 |
| Pennsylvania | Private operators tied to land-based licences | 2019 | Among the largest US online casino markets |
| Michigan | Commercial and tribal operators competing | 2021 | Online casino gross receipts above US$3 billion in 2025 |
| Ontario | Private operators under a provincial agency | 2022 | About C$4 billion in total iGaming revenue in 2025 |
| Alberta | Private operators, launch planned for 2026 | 2026 (planned) | Government PlayAlberta site only until launch |
| British Columbia and Quebec | Single government-run platform | 2000s onward | Public monopoly, revenue kept in provincial accounts |
| California | No legal real-money online casino | Not legalized | Free-to-play sweepstakes model restricted from 2026 |
The headline takeaway is that Ontario’s open market already produces revenue in the same range as a mature American state such as New Jersey, whose full-year internet gaming win reached roughly US$2.9 billion in 2025. A single Canadian province, four years into competitive licensing, now trades in the same league as the states Americans treat as their benchmarks. That comparison would have sounded far-fetched in 2021, when most of Canada still ran online casinos through public monopolies and the American market was concentrated in a small cluster of eastern states.
Where sweepstakes and social casinos actually fit
Any comparison this tidy runs into a category that muddies the water on both sides of the border, so it is worth being precise about it. Sweepstakes and social casinos are not real-money online casinos. They run on a free-to-play or dual-currency model, where the coins used to play generally cannot be bought and cashed out the way a regulated casino balance can. Companies have used that structure to offer casino-style games in places where a licensed real-money casino is not available, which is why the format spread fastest in states that never legalized the real thing.
That distinction has real legal teeth right now. California, the largest American state, has no legal real-money online casino at all, and it has moved against the workaround too. A new state law, Assembly Bill 831, restricts the dual-currency sweepstakes model beginning in 2026, closing a door that operators had been using to reach players there. So a Californian is not choosing between regulated online casinos the way a New Jersey resident is. In practical terms, real-money online casino play is available only in a small group of states, and the free-to-play products that look similar are a separate thing with their own, tightening rules.
Canadian readers should carry the same caution. A brand advertising casino-style games is not automatically a licensed, real-money, provincially regulated operator. The label on the tin and the legal status underneath it are two different questions, and the gap between them is exactly where consumer risk lives.
What each side could learn from the other
The American experience offers Canada a warning and a template at once. The warning is that a purely public monopoly leaves a large share of players outside any local oversight, using offshore sites that answer to no one in the country. Ontario’s open market and Alberta’s coming one are essentially the Canadian version of the argument American reformers made a decade ago, that it is safer to license and tax the activity than to pretend it is not happening.
Canada, in turn, has something to teach the United States about front-loading player protection. Several American programs bolted responsible-gambling tools and self-exclusion registries on well after launch, once the harms were already visible. Alberta’s decision to stand up a centralized self-exclusion system before opening its doors is the kind of sequencing many American states skipped and later wished they had not. Deposit limits, cooling-off tools, and a single place to opt out across every operator are far easier to build into a market from day one than to retrofit later.
By clinging to ancient, government-controlled platforms, provinces are choosing to lose millions in revenue while leaving citizens vulnerable.
Image by Viktor Ustinov
There is also a shared blind spot. Both countries lean on operators to compete on promotions and bonuses, which can pull attention away from the slower work of harm prevention. The jurisdictions that will look best in ten years are likely the ones that treated licensing revenue and player safety as one project rather than two, and neither country has fully cracked that balance yet.
What the next few years look like on both sides of the border
The American map will keep filling in slowly rather than all at once. Online casino bills tend to stall where land-based operators and labour groups fear cannibalization, so expansion is likely to come state by state, with a new market or two every couple of years rather than a national breakthrough. The states already live will keep growing on their own, and the public revenue figures make the case for the next state that considers it. Anyone who wants the raw numbers can read New Jersey’s monthly gaming revenue reports, which break internet gaming win out from the rest of the state’s gambling take and show how steady the climb has been.
Canada’s path is likely to be the more interesting one to watch. If Alberta’s launch goes smoothly, other provinces facing the same offshore leakage will have two working Canadian examples rather than one, and the pressure to abandon the monopoly model will grow. The provinces that stay closed will have to explain why they are leaving both the tax revenue and the regulatory control on the table while their neighbours collect both.
For readers here, the useful frame is not which country is ahead. It is that both are converging on the same conclusion from different starting points. The United States is proving that a state-by-state licensed market can be large and durable, and Canada is proving that a province can adopt that same open model and make it work inside its own rules. The map on each side of the border will keep changing, and the smart money is on more provinces and more states opening, not fewer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are online casinos legal everywhere in the United States?
No. Real-money online casinos are legal in only a small group of states, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, each under its own state regulator. Most states still do not permit them at all, and a game being available online does not mean it is licensed where you are sitting.
How is Canada’s approach different from the American one?
The United States licenses private operators state by state, while Canada handles online gambling province by province. For years that meant a single government-run site per province, and Ontario was the first to open a competitive market to private brands in 2022, with Alberta set to become the second in 2026.
Is online casino play legal in California?
California has no legal real-money online casino. It has also moved to restrict the free-to-play sweepstakes model that some companies used as a workaround, with a new state law limiting that format beginning in 2026, so casino-style options for Californians are narrowing rather than expanding.
What is the difference between a real-money casino and a sweepstakes casino?
A real-money casino is licensed and regulated, and players can deposit and withdraw cash directly. A sweepstakes or social casino runs on a free-to-play or dual-currency system where the play money generally cannot be purchased and cashed out the same way. They can look identical on screen but sit under very different legal rules.
Why is Alberta opening its market when other provinces have not?
Alberta estimates that a large majority of its online gambling activity already runs through unregulated offshore sites. Opening a licensed market is an effort to bring that activity under provincial rules, collect tax on it, and attach consumer protections such as centralized self-exclusion, following the template Ontario set in 2022.
This content is a joint venture between our publication and our partner. We do not endorse any product or service mentioned in the article.
0 Comments