HALIFAX, N.S. May 25, 2016/ Troy Media/ – The recent court decision acquitting Gérard Comeau portends well for free trade in Canada. According to the judge, the law that Comeau was accused of breaking – transporting liquor into New Brunswick – violates the constitutionality of free trade between the provinces, going back to 1867.
Unfortunately, it is not only restrictions on the trading of alcohol that stands in the way of the Canada’s founders’ dream. Many Atlantic Canadians know well that when it comes to doing business across provincial boundaries, discrepancies in laws and regulations can be nightmarish. Any business that works in more than one province must contend with unnecessarily varying government rules.
It boggles the mind that four provinces with small populations and such tight-knit economies continue to burden their entrepreneurs. This is why the Joint Office of Regulatory and Service Effectiveness was struck last autumn: to attempt to resolve at least the more egregious problems between New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and P.E.I. This office has made some progress, such as with mutual recognition for pay stubs and occupational health standards.
But there remains a long way to go. In transportation, especially, the need for different permits and to observe varying rules for hauling routes stifles efficiency, hinders trade and raises costs. Different rules for workers’ compensation processes can multiply the regulatory burden for those who work in more than one province. Disputes over regulations and rulings are decided separately, again bogging the system down without cause.
For safety regulations, especially, the provinces should see that they have the same goals. Why should a hotel chain have to subject its elevators to different inspection processes in four provinces, for instance, when the elevators are no doubt produced by the same manufacturer and maintained by the same company, not to mention that they are used by people from throughout the region? If a vehicle is safe on the roads of P.E.I., shouldn’t it be safe enough for use in Nova Scotia, without a separate process to register and inspect it?
The political objective here should be simple: to break down all barriers, overcome all obstacles, and invalidate all irritants to interprovincial exchange. To this end, an Atlantic Canadian free-trade agreement is one idea. But it isn’t the best one.
Although implementing free movement of labour, common dispute-settlement mechanisms, harmonized investment standards, transferable professional accreditations and mutually-recognized business permits is theoretically easy, it is likely that the provinces could end up negotiating for years over minute details. These are years we don’t have, according to the Ivany report of 2014 ([popup url=”http://onens.ca/wp-content/uploads/Now_or_never_short.pdf” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]Now or Never: An Urgent Call to Action for Nova Scotians[/popup]), which says that our economy will careen toward a cliff unless we foster a stronger culture of entrepreneurship.
A better option is for each of the Atlantic provinces to seek individual entry to the New West Partnership Trade Agreement. Signed in 2010 and functioning as a free exchange zone between British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan (and soon to include Manitoba), it opens trade relations, labour mobility and investment between member provinces. By joining this trade agreement, the Atlantic provinces would join a fully-functioning, ready-made set of standards where there is free flow of goods, services and capital; certified workers can practise without extra tests or obstacles; residence requirements for business registration are waived; unnecessary differences in business standards are removed; and where an open procurement process exists alongside a dispute settlement mechanism. Joining would produce a virtual agreement between Atlantic provinces, add new markets and a common trade policy with three dynamic co-members of the federation.
Nationally, an economic union of east and west would have a salutary effect on the centre. Most of our trade is with Ontario and Quebec, which would be most vulnerable to a trade crunch with the United States. As an added bonus, the capacity of the west and the east to speak with a common voice on national infrastructure projects such as the Energy East Pipeline could help to advance such interests in Ottawa.
The Atlantic provinces have shown a desire for greater openness and more efficient standards of regulation. But there is no need to reinvent the wheel. Joining the New West Partnership Trade Agreement is the best opportunity available.
On the threshold of our 150th anniversary as a country, Atlantic Canada could bring us closer to the dreams that the founders of our Dominion struggled so hard to build.
Marco Navarro-Génie is president and CEO of the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies (AIMS.ca).
Marco is a Troy Media [popup url=”http://marketplace.troymedia.com/our-contributors/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]contributor[/popup]. [popup url=”https://www.troymedia.com/become-a-troy-media-contributor/” height=”600″ width=”600″ scrollbars=”1″] Why aren’t you?[/popup]
[popup url=”http://marketplace.troymedia.com/2016/05/atlantic-provinces-join-western-free-trade-deal/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]Download[/popup] this column
The views, opinions and positions expressed by all Troy Media columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Troy Media.
[popup url=”https://www.troymedia.com/submit-your-letter-to-the-editor/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]Submit a letter to the editor[/popup]
Troy Media Marketplace © 2016 – All Rights Reserved
Trusted editorial content provider to media outlets across Canada