Reading Time: 4 minutes

Gwyn MorganThe demise of Sears Canada has seen 16,000 employees lose their jobs. It’s unfortunate, but inevitable, as online giants Amazon and Alibaba transform the retail universe. But what shouldn’t be inevitable is the loss of pension benefits for those employees and another 18,000 Sears retirees.

If the 2009 bankruptcy of tech giant Nortel is a guide, it will be years before Sears pension plan members know if they will receive any compensation for the loss of pensions they dutifully paid into for decades. Nortel employees endured a seven-year battle before receiving a fraction of what they were entitled to.

The root cause of this travesty is that, under Canadian bankruptcy law, secured creditors such as banks and bondholders stand ahead of pension plan members in the distribution of insolvency assets. Meanwhile, government employees face no risk of losing their pensions. This means that the only Canadians who can really count on their pensions are the employees of the same government that prevents private sector employees from being able to count on theirs.

The Nortel bankruptcy ignited calls for changes to Canadian bankruptcy law but the federal government failed to act. That led to a series of legal challenges that reached the Supreme Court of Canada in 2013 after aluminum products manufacturer Indalex declared bankruptcy, jeopardizing staff pensions. The United Steelworkers-led lawsuit raised hopes that the high court would finally force change. But those hopes were dashed when the court ruled that pension plan members were simply among the unsecured creditors.

The plight of Sears pensioners has once again ignited calls for change, motivating a private member’s bill in Parliament. But the only reaction from Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains was issuance of this pathetic statement: “The government is connecting Sears employees with services to help them through this difficult time.” There’s been no indication the government is considering changing bankruptcy laws that leave pensioners unprotected.

One of the arguments that has deterred governments from changing bankruptcy law is that it would harm the ability of Canadian companies to access debt capital. As the former chief executive officer of a company that raised tens of billions of dollars in Canadian debt markets, I can honestly say that no banker or bond holder ever paid any attention to the funding status of our defined benefit pension plan. In reality, the only time lenders become concerned about employee pension obligations is when a company is at the brink of collapse, in which case they wouldn’t consider lending anyway.

Calls for the Sears retirees to receive higher priority in distribution of insolvency assets have encountered opposition from the 250 independent local Hometown dealers whose businesses were destroyed by the Sears Canada closure. Clearly, their position is bleak, but the situation isn’t comparable to that of the pensioners. Like all business owners, they knew their financial future depended on saving profits made over the years. Moreover, the demise of Sears is part of a massive restructuring of the entire retail sector that’s been evident for some time.

By contrast, Sears pensioners, many of whom spent most or all of their careers working for the company, were content with modest pay in the belief that the compulsory pension plan they paid into for decades would provide security for their retirement years. They had no reason to believe otherwise. Sadly, this belief has made them worse off now than if they never had a pension plan and had been left to make other retirement preparations.

Sears Canada is jointly owned by U.S.-based Sears Holdings Corp. and an American hedge fund that is run, strangely enough, by the CEO of Sears Holdings.

Between 2005 and 2013, the company sold its prime Canadian real estate assets and sent $3.5 billion south of the border to those shareholders by way of special dividends and share buy-backs.

That the Sears Canada board would make the unconscionable decision to approve of this massive asset stripping, while leaving its pension plan woefully underfunded, begs for legal retribution.

But that would only increase the costly and time-consuming bankruptcy court wrangling, further lessening any chance that the 16,000 laid-off employees and 18,000 retirees will ever receive any part of the meagre assets still left in the company.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau likes to portray the image of a leader looking out for the little guy. It’s time he walked the talk.

The federal government should act now to change the law to prevent Sears and other private-sector defined benefit pension plan members from seeing their futures torn apart in bankruptcy court.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired Canadian business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

sears, pension

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.