Re-inventing how Canadians stay in touch.

Taxing savers is not the solution to Canada’s economic woes

Miguel Ouellette

Now that the federal election is over, several financial sector experts and economists are turning their attention to the Trudeau government’s promise to raise the corporate income tax rate for banks and insurance companies from 15 per cent to 18 per cent.

But while attacking these financial giants can pay off politically, the fact is that these measures will instead have the effect of penalizing Canadian families and savers.

Governing based on electoral motives rarely generates the hoped-for economic results, especially when we’re talking about raising tax rates for a key sector of our economy that determines in part the retirement incomes of millions of Canadians.

Indeed, while the image of a banker with a glass of scotch in one hand and a Cuban cigar in the other, sitting atop his tower in downtown Toronto, may capture the popular imagination, it is worth our while to ponder just where these financial institutions’ profits end up.

In Canada, the performance of many public pension plans depends in part on the increase in the value of the shares of Canadian banks and insurance companies. For example, the Canada Pension Plan holds substantial assets in the financial sector year after year. Thus, when the profits of these financial institutions are artificially reduced by a tax increase, it is all savers who suffer.

Click here to downloadIn other words, millions of Canadians are indirectly shareholders of our banks and share in their profits. That’s quite far removed from our imaginary stereotype of a rich banker.

Moreover, although there are few charter banks in Canada due to the current regulatory framework, the financial sector remains highly competitive. Just think, for instance, of the frequent promotions offered by financial institutions, or of the permanent reduction in various fees, as we are seeing with the elimination of brokerage fees by certain banks.

But it’s clear that the sector will not be able to remain as competitive if new fiscal and regulatory obstacles are thrown in its path. And it is consumers who will end up paying the price, through the potential increase in certain fees.

The Trudeau government justifies these new tax proposals by invoking the increased spending during the pandemic and the desire to augment federal government revenues. However, before considering increasing the tax burden borne by Canadian companies and individuals, policy-makers should instead look for ways to control public spending.

In barely five years, the federal debt has doubled in size, with the country recording deficits even in periods of economic growth before the pandemic. The solution must come from the spending side, not the revenue side.

After all, even if we add up all the new measures for increasing revenues presented in the federal budget (combined with the maximum revenues that could be collected thanks to a one-time wealth tax), it would take the federal government just a little less than sixteen days to spend these new revenues.

Populist political measures like raising taxes on banks and insurance companies usually only generate very superficial revenues for government, but they entail substantial costs for consumers and savers.

Our governments have to stop giving in to political and popular pressures and focus instead on the economic analysis of their public policies and their consequences for Canadian families, all while controlling spending to avoid shortchanging future generations.

Miguel Ouellette is Director of Operations and Economist at the Montreal Economic Institute. 

Miguel is a Troy Media contributor. For interview requests, click here.


This commentary was submitted by the Montreal Economic Institute, an independent public policy think tank based in Montreal. MEI is a Troy Media Editorial Content Provider Partner.

Through its publications and media appearances, the MEI stimulates debate on public policies across Canada by proposing reforms based on market principles and entrepreneurship.

Donate

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the authors’ alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.

© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.

Troy Media

Independent journalism, free to read and use.

Daily commentary and analysis from Canada's trusted editorial network. All content is free to use, but you need an account to download.

Register for free access Log in to your account

Join the Discussion

We’d love to hear your thoughts. Become a free member to join our discussion threads. Troy Media welcomes civil, relevant discussion. Commenting is a privilege, not a right. All comments are subject to moderation.

By submitting a comment, you agree to our rules and policies.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

By commenting, you agree that:

  • Anonymous or false identities are not permitted
  • Personal attacks, defamation, hate speech, threats, spam, or off-topic posts will be removed
  • Comments must address the article, not other commenters
  • Moderation decisions are final

Troy Media may remove comments or close commenting at any time. If you want debate, argue ideas. If you want chaos, comment elsewhere.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This
Secret Link