To fight inflation, we have to measure it better

The method StatsCan uses to measure inflation bears no relationship to the reality Canadians face

Reading Time: 3 minutes

By Nathalie Elgrably-Lévy
and Valentin Petkantchin

For several months now, rising prices have dominated public consciousness and raised anxiety in most households. Not for decades has Statistics Canada’s monthly inflation rate indicator been awaited with such rapt attention. This indicator is much like a thermometer monitoring a patient’s fever while under observation.

Nathalie Elgrably-Levy
Nathalie Elgrably-Levy
Valentin Petkantchin
Valentin Petkantchin
Photo by krakenimages on Unsplash
Related Stories
Food inflation eases but some prices keep surging
Summertime and inflation ain’t easy


Economic growth coming close to a dead stop by end of 2022

The most recent data show the rate of price increases slowing down, from 8.1 per cent in June to 7.6 per cent in July. But the reality perceived by consumers is markedly different. So how do we explain this disconnect?

What appears paradoxical, in reality is not. The explanation for this lies in the calculation methods employed by Statistics Canada. The public agency measures the official inflation rate based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the past 12 months. That is why it can state, for example, that the CPI has increased by 7.6 per cent year-over-year. We can call this the “retrospective” (backward-looking) rate of price inflation, a rate firmly rooted in the past.

As this rate calculates the loss of purchasing power already recorded over the past year, it provides very limited information on the inflation we are experiencing at the moment, the rate we are suffering under right now, or even, for example, over the past month or quarter.

Consider the following analogy. Since the official rate is retrospective, it is like knowing the average speed at which a car has travelled over the course of the last hour. This data allows us to measure the distance travelled during that hour, but it tells us nothing at all about the car’s current speed. Is the car travelling at 50 km/h, 80 km/h or 120 km/h? Has it stopped? The average speed over the last hour cannot answer these questions. It is, therefore, of little use in predicting the distance that will be travelled in the next hour if the current speed is maintained.

This is why we should be much more concerned with the prospective (forward-looking) inflation rate, which is derived by looking at changes in the CPI. This figure, not the one in the headlines, has far more potential to reveal what’s in store for us. It is also important to note that this forward-looking rate is not a recent invention – Statistics Canada was publishing it up until 2007!

By focusing on the prospective rate, we could have discerned the first signs that inflation was exceeding the two per cent objective in July of 2020, almost a full year before official statistics showed any deviation from the target rate. Worse still, the prospective rate was in double digits last May, at 12.5 per cent, before it fell back below 10 per cent in July.

This prospective rate, therefore, represents a very different way of looking at inflation, one that turns out to be far more reflective of Canadians’ lived experience. Using such information, monetary authorities could have corrected their policies much more quickly and thus more effectively combatted the erosion of Canadians’ purchasing power.

Nathalie Elgrably-Lévy is a Senior Economist and Valentin Petkantchin is Vice President, Research at the Montreal Economic Institute. They are the authors of For a Better CPI Indicator in Canada.

For interview requests, click here.


The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.

© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.

Nathalie Elgrably-Levy

Nathalie Elgrably-Lévy has taught economics at HEC Montréal since 1992. She also taught economics for several years at the University of Montreal and at UQAM. She is the author of La face cachée des politiques publiques, published in 2006 by Les Éditions Logiques, and she produced a Quebec adaptation of the 6th edition of Microeconomics, by Pyndick and Rubinfeld. She is also a columnist with Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec. She worked during part of 2008 as a senior economist with the Fraser Institute. She holds a master’s degree in management from HEC Montréal, with a specialization in applied economics and a thesis on the federal budget deficit. Her research interests focus on assessing public policy.

Read more from the same author:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.