Why research and development budgets so often blow up

Innovation is unpredictable but your research and development spending doesn’t have to be.
Getty Images

Budgeting in research and development is one of the toughest activities of both growing and established businesses. Research and development work is not like the normal operational spending, it is uncertain in nature and the results of the work cannot always be forecasted. Goal-based budgeting provides a method of managing such uncertainty in a manner that financial control is achieved. Through spending being associated with distinct points of progress, business can aid innovation without losing sight of accountability, cash flow and long term strategy.

Milestone Based Budgeting

Milestone based budgeting emphasizes on dividing research and development projects into quantifiable steps instead of funding projects as one lump sum. All milestones are milestones, i.e., a certain success, e.g. the completion of a prototype, a proven technical solution, or a testing stage. This structure assists the decision makers to get an outline of where the money is being expended and what will happen at each of the stages. It also establishes natural gateways whereby teams are able to evaluate outputs ahead of time.

The process of identifying milestones involves the cooperation of technical teams and financial leaders since goals need to be realistic and meaningful. The milestones must measure the technical progress in a manner that is easy to measure objectively. Milestones have been known to be very clear and provide clarity not only to internal stakeholders but also the external partners. This is especially helpful when dealing with advisors or companies providing SR&ED consulting as accurate documentation and tracking of progress can be used to assist in budgeting and also compliance.

Allocating Budgets to Milestones

When milestones are put in place, the next thing will be to allocate adequate budgets to each phase. Otherwise, businesses are expected to allocate funds proportionally instead of allocating them equally, and spend according to what resources they need to accomplish certain results. The initial milestones can be exploratory and feasible and can be relatively cheap, whereas subsequent milestones like testing or refining can be more expensive. This will avoid excessive expenditure at the initial stage and save capital to be used at the crucial stages later.

Such allocation of budgets also enhances decision making in case of change of priorities. When a milestone indicates that the project is no longer viable, the extra funds can be invested in other projects which have higher potential. Such an opportunity contributes to better portfolio management in numerous areas of research and development. This adaptive model of budgeting is a common point of focus in firms such as G6 Consulting that are focused more on maintaining financial discipline and at the same time responding swiftly to new information and technical discoveries.

Monitoring Progress and Spending

Milestone budgeting requires a regular check on progress and expenses. Every milestone must initiate an evaluation comparing the real outcomes and expenses with the estimates. Such reviews are not required to slow innovation but it must give a clear picture of whether the project is yielding value as compared to how it was invested. There is also the presence of regular check ins, which promote transparency between financial managers and research teams.

Milestone reviews will produce valuable data over time that can subsequently be used to increase the accuracy of future budgeting. Trends in cost increase, schedule slippage or some surprises in efficiencies may be used to make improved estimates in future projects. This continuous feedback process enhances organizational learning and minimizes the chances of making the same errors on budgeting. By considering the milestone reviews as opportunities to learn instead of control mechanisms, business organizations have the opportunity to instill a culture that appreciates innovation along with sound financial management.

Adjusting Budgets Over Time

None of the research and development plans are fixed and the milestone based budgets are supposed to be created to change. Timelines and funding levels might need to change with changes in market conditions, technical challenges or strategic priorities. This is facilitated by milestone budgeting since decisions are pegged to certain levels and not abstract forecasts. Leaders have the ability to update budgets with the clear picture of what has been already accomplished and what is ahead.

This flexibility also facilitates long term planning as it offers a systematic account of how the projects are going to be implemented with the course of time. The organizations are in a position to optimize future budgets and make more realistically set expectations as they mature based on the previous milestone data. The outcome is a budgeting process that is enhanced with every project cycle. With a financial planning process being in line with quantifiable progress, business organizations can continue to be innovative and remain optimistic with the investments they make in research and development.

This content is a joint venture between our publication and our partner. We do not endorse any product or service mentioned in the article.