Reading Time: 3 minutes

Matthew LauFor decades, politicians, pundits and activists have clamoured about a gender pay gap and have cited statistics purporting to show that the economy is unfair to women.

Women, after all, get paid only around 70 to 80 cents for every dollar earned by men.

However, for just as long, studies have shown that this discrepancy is not due to any unfairness. Instead, it’s simply due to different choices men and women make.

The evidence shows that one of the drivers of the gender pay gap is the types of jobs men and women perform.

For example, dangerous occupations are filled disproportionately by men. In the United States, men account for 92.5 percent of all occupational fatalities. In these relatively dangerous occupations – such as fishing or logging – workers have to be compensated more for the danger they accept.

Another major driver of the gender pay gap is the division of labour in the household. Women are more likely than men to take time off their jobs to raise children or do housework, meaning that on average they will be at their jobs for fewer hours per week and spend more years out of the workforce. It’s no surprise, then, that on average their earnings will be lower. That’s not due to unfairness, it’s simply because of the lifestyle choices they make.

After controlling for the relevant factors, such as education, experience, occupation and hours worked, studies find that the gender pay gap disappears.

Two recent American studies highlight how different choices made by men and women – rather than bias or unfairness – contribute to different levels of earnings.

One of these studies found that male drivers for the ride-sharing company Uber earned seven percent more per hour than female drivers. This seems surprising because the drivers are “doing the same job in a setting where work assignments are made by a gender-blind algorithm and the pay structure is tied directly to output and not negotiated.”

So how can a gender pay gap still exist?

For a few reasons, according to the study. First, male Uber drivers earned more on average because they tended to drive faster than women. Secondly, because male drivers worked more hours, they became more experienced and knew better where and when to drive in order to maximize income, and when they should cancel or accept trips. Thirdly, males were more likely to target the most profitable locations to drive.

The authors of the study found no evidence of discrimination either by Uber or its customers. Instead, they concluded that different choices made by male and female drivers – what speeds to drive, how many hours to drive and where to drive – created the earnings gap.

Another study found that among bus and train operators from the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, female workers made 11 percent less per week than their male counterparts. As with Uber, discrimination was an unlikely explanation for this pay gap since the job is in “a unionized environment where work tasks are similar, hourly wages are identical and tenure dictates promotions.”

The authors found that “the weekly earnings gap can be explained by the workplace choices that women and men make. Women value time away from work and flexibility more than men, taking more unpaid time off using the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and working fewer overtime hours than men. When overtime hours are scheduled three months in advance, men and women work a similar number of hours; but when those hours are offered at the last minute, men work nearly twice as many.”

As these studies show, even in environments where men and women perform the same jobs and compensation is determined in a gender-blind way, men and women will still earn different amounts of money.

That’s not due to unfairness. It’s simply because they make different choices to reflect their preferences.

Matthew Lau is a research associate with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

gender pay gap

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.