Teachers’ unions are undermining their own long-term viability

Parents can no longer rely on the public system for their kid's education

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Michael ZwaagstraFinally, schools across Canada are starting to reopen. Most provinces had switched to remote learning at the beginning of January to assess the impact of the Omicron variant. But now, thankfully, these remote learning sessions are coming to an end.

Given this trend, it looks likely that all Canadian students who want to be back in class will be able to return soon.

Unfortunately, some teachers’ unions have been less than helpful when it comes to getting students back to school. Instead, they have pushed the narrative that schools are “unsafe” and that it is better for students to learn remotely.

For example, at the beginning of January, the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (ETFO) called for a delay to the restart of in-person learning. Some of the safety measures they wanted in place included N95 masks for all students and teachers, mandatory vaccinations for everyone who works in or attends a school, and an expanded paid sick leave program.

However, these demands are unreasonable. Not only are N95 masks costly, but they are also difficult to acquire in bulk and hard for students to use effectively. Mandatory vaccines to attend school would be highly dubious since this would deny an education to many students because of a medical decision made by their parents. As for expanding sick leave, it is well-known that teachers already have generous sick leave benefits.

The ETFO is far from the only teachers’ union to make such unreasonable demands. Earlier last month, the Manitoba Teachers’ Society (MTS) publicly demanded that all schools be moved into remote learning for the entire month of January. MTS wanted only the children of “essential” workers to attend in-person classes and for everyone else to stay home.

In recent media interviews, MTS President James Bedford claimed that moving to remote learning is, for now, the best option for students. However, he must know that remote learning is substantially inferior to in-person learning. Sitting at home and looking at a screen is a poor substitute for an active in-person learning experience.

Teachers’ unions fail to realize that by demanding that schools be closed, they are undermining their own long-term viability. Right now, teachers’ unions across Canada are in the enviable position of having a monopoly over public schooling. In every province, membership in the teachers’ union is either automatic or compulsory for all public school teachers (except those employed by charter schools in Alberta).

Thus, teachers’ unions have a secure position and a guaranteed revenue stream from dues-paying teachers. The vast majority of students in all provinces and territories attend public schools, which means that each teacher’s union has plenty of members. So long as public school enrolment remains stable and provinces require all public school teachers to pay union dues, teachers’ unions will not have to worry about losing money or their monopoly control.

But that might be about to change.

Many parents are fed up with ongoing school closures. Nowhere has this been more evident than in Ontario, where students have spent more time out of class than any other jurisdiction in North America. By consistently advocating for school closures, teachers’ unions have put themselves offside with the many parents who depend on a reliable and effective public school system for their children.

If parents cannot rely on public schools, they will remove their kids and place them in private schools or even homeschool them. Once this becomes a trend, it will pick up steam. If school boards shrink in enrollment, they will have no choice but to reduce the number of teachers they employ. This will impact the bottom line of teachers’ unions in a big way.

In addition, it makes little sense for provinces to continue giving teachers’ unions a monopoly if these unions are making it impossible for schools to function. If even one province decided to disrupt the status quo and allow teachers to opt out of paying union dues, or if a province chose to provide more funding to independent schools, this could become a trend across the country. After all, many grassroots teachers want to get back into the classroom and they aren’t particularly happy with their unions advocating for school closures.

Teachers’ unions might be in a secure position now, but they had better be careful not to disrupt the education system too much. They could find themselves on the outside looking in and wondering what happened to their comfortable monopolies.

Michael Zwaagstra is a public high school teacher and a senior fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Michael is a Troy Media contributor. For interview requests, click here.


The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.

© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.

Michael Zwaagstra

Michael Zwaagstra is a public high school teacher and author. He has extensive teaching experience at a variety of grade levels and currently teaches high school social studies in Manitoba. Michael received his Bachelor of Education, Post-Baccalaureate Certificate in Education and Master of Education degrees from the University of Manitoba where he won numerous academic awards including the A. W. Hogg Undergraduate Scholarship, the Klieforth Prize in American History and the Schoolmasters’ Wives Association Scholarship. He also holds a Master of Arts in Theological Studies from Liberty University and graduated with high distinction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.