Managing invasive species better than eliminating them: research

Every year, hundreds of introduced species cause billions of dollars in damage

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Managing invasive species – not eliminating them altogether – is a better use of time and conservation resources in many cases, according to a study led by a University of Alberta biologist.

Every year, hundreds of introduced species cause billions of dollars in damage to ecosystems, agriculture and infrastructure in North America alone. The research, led by Stephanie Green, makes a case for working smarter, not harder, to temper the impact of destructive and widespread invasive species using a strategy called functional eradication.

Lionfish
U of A biologist Stephanie Green captures a lionfish for her research on invasive species. Green led a new study suggesting that managing invasive species in specific areas may be more practical and effective than trying to eliminate them altogether. (Photo courtesy of Stephanie Green)

“Rather than trying to completely eliminate invasive species that have spread over large areas, which is very challenging, functional eradication aims to limit their abundances below levels that damage the ecosystem in priority locations. Resources that might otherwise be wasted on attempting complete eradication can be spread to other areas, protecting more places from impacts,” explained Green, assistant professor in the Department of Biological Sciences and Canada Research Chair in Aquatic Global Change Ecology and Conservation.

Green partnered with Edwin Grosholz, an ecologist in the Department of Environmental Science and Policy at the University of California, Davis, to survey 232 natural resource managers and invasive species specialists in Canada and the United States.

“More than 90 per cent of these folks said the most destructive invaders in their regions were spread beyond a scale at which they could eradicate them, and instead local teams were engaged in a long-term battle to suppress or contain the species,” explained Green.

However, only two per cent said they had identified targets for when they had done enough to manage a species.

“This points to a major gap between the needs of the people who must make decisions about invasive species, and the information scientists and monitoring programs are collecting,” said Grosholz.

European green crab
The European green crab is spreading along the coasts of the western United States and maritime Canada and is now found along the western coast of Vancouver Island, the Gulf of St. Lawrence and Newfoundland. Their invasion has caused dramatic losses of native species in the western U.S. and losses of clams, mussels and oysters in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence and Prince Edward Island. Sustained removal of green crabs from sites in Newfoundland allowed some recovery of native Jonah crabs. (Photo: Edwin Grosholz, UC Davis)

Managing widespread invasive species is a long-term endeavour but not one without hope, Green explained.

“Involving local communities in the functional eradication process is essential for maintaining the capacity needed to continually suppress these invaders.”

An example of functional eradication at work is invasive lionfish. The beautiful Indo-Pacific fish, which are popular in aquariums, have spread throughout the Caribbean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, where they prey on many native species. They are now caught and consumed as food, and used in local art. The financial incentives for catching lionfish are also serving to reduce their population below levels that affect native species in the area.

Similar strategies can be applied to the European green crab, an invasive species found along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts in Canada and the United States, as well as Prussian carp, which is spreading throughout central Canada, including in Alberta’s Bow River.

“Our study shows that ecologically damaging and widespread invasive species are prime candidates for functional eradication. To effectively keep populations down in priority areas, targets need to be based on how many of the invasive species it takes to cause major changes in the ecosystem,” said Green.

The study, “Functional eradication as a framework for invasive species control,” was published on the cover of the March issue of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

| By Katie Willis for Troy Media

This article was submitted by the University of Alberta’s Folio, online magazine. Folio is a Troy Mediainvasive species Editorial Content Provider Partner.


COMMUNITY NEWS OUTLET ACTION PLAN!
WEBSITE HOSTING AND ALL TROY MEDIA EDITORIAL CONTENT POSTED TO YOUR SITE DAILY FOR ONLY $129.95 PER MONTH.
Limited time offer: Get your first 2 months FREE! Click here for details


Partner Content

Become a Troy Media Editorial Content Partner provider. Contact us at editorial@troymedia.com for details.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.