China’s serving up a dilemma for Canadian agriculture

Canada's meat industry will suffer if China's move to lower consumption is successful

RSS236
Follow by Email
Facebook0
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn

china agricultureHALIFAX, N.S. June 27, 2016/ Troy Media/ – China consumes 28 per cent of the globe’s meat, including half of its pork. But changes could be coming that will have a dramatic impact on Canada’s agriculture industry.

Years ago, the average Chinese consumer ate about 13 kg; now the average is 63 kg per person and could increase by another 30 kg by 2030.

These are staggering numbers for a country with a population of 1.3 billion and, if nothing changes, they will only go up.

But Chinese public health officials recommend that consumers eat only 40 to 75 grams of meat per day – 50 per cent less than current levels – and look at alternative sources of protein.

Less meat consumption will not only cause changes for China, but also for the rest of the western world, particularly for Canada, and would affect our relationship with animal proteins.

China, like many nations, revisits its food policies once a decade and issues a new food guide to influence consumer behaviour. Since the last guide, the food landscape has changed dramatically. In China, people even consider KFC a great place to have a romantic encounter.

The increase in animal proteins consumption occurred in part because the Chinese believe that to be rich or perceived to be rich, you must eat meat. That attitude, however, is slowly eroding.

The new food guidelines recommend a reduction in meat consumption per capita, from 63 kg per year to between 14 kg to 27 kg. While the underlying intent is to reduce obesity and other health challenges, the implications also include the environmental impact.

In fact, because livestock production is responsible for 14.5 per cent of global climate change emissions,  environmental groups are likely to welcome China’s change in consumption guidelines.

For Canada, this may mean a change in how we approach Asian markets. We currently look at trade deals as gateways to untapped markets where consumers crave more animal proteins. Discussion on protein quality is slowly going mainstream and many governments are increasingly concerned about the sustainability of livestock production. So the potential of Asian markets may need to be revisited as a result of these new guidelines.

There will always be a market for animal protein, but it can only grow by recognizing value-added features. Chains such as A&W, [popup url=”http://www.troymedia.com/2016/06/10/serving-sustainable-beef-mcdonalds/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]McDonald’s[/popup], and even [popup url=”http://www.troymedia.com/2016/05/12/dear-earls-beef-dilemma-already-solved/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]Earls Kitchen and Bar[/popup], with its recent humane beef misstep, can speak to how complicated meat consumption has become. As markets mature and become more fragmented, consumers will look for products that reflect the food supply chain and responsible production practices. Issues like animal welfare, organically-focused methods and locally-produced commodities have market currency in many places.

Oddly, based on national food guides, China sees things differently.

Animal protein consumption has been managed and stewarded differently in North America. Lobby groups representing the beef industry have successfully defied government suggestions of new meat consumption guidelines.

However, with China’s call to encourage consumers to look at proteins differently, our beef industry may be at odds with global trends. Beef consumption has been dropping in Canada for decades. So a change in the architecture of the industry only makes sense, and these adjustments need to happen quickly.

That’s particularly true if other Asian countries follow suit. China and the rest of Asia have been seen as beacons of hope for our cattle industry, which has looked to other markets to sell a commodity that is an increasingly difficult sell in the eyes of the modern western consumer.

Since it has a highly organized and co-ordinated economy, China may succeed in reducing meat consumption over the next decade or so. It will be interesting to see how North America and Canada react.

But for now, China may have understood something that the western world has yet to grasp.

Troy Media columnist Sylvain Charlebois is Dean of the Faculty of Management and Professor in the Faculty of Agriculture at Dalhousie University. Sylvain is included in Troy Media’s Unlimited Access subscription plan.

[popup url=”http://marketplace.troymedia.com/2016/06/chinas-serving-dilemma-canadian-agriculture/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]Download[/popup] this column


The views, opinions and positions expressed by all Troy Media columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Troy Media.

[popup url=”http://www.troymedia.com/submit-your-letter-to-the-editor/” height=”1000″ width=”1000″ scrollbars=”1″]Submit a letter to the editor[/popup]

Troy Media Marketplace © 2016 – All Rights Reserved
Trusted editorial content provider to media outlets across Canada

One Response to "China’s serving up a dilemma for Canadian agriculture"

  1. Karsten Schellhas
    Karsten Schellhas   June 27, 2016 at 11:42 am

    Well written article. Recognizing value added features is imperative but also innovation and bringing new products with value to the customer. A visitor from the European Meat industry recently told me there is nothing new and exciting in meat and deli counters in Canada. How can we change that? How can we make sure that constant innovation and bringing products to the marketplace is part of the Canadian Soul?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login