By Charles Lammam
and Hugh MacIntyre
The Fraser Institute
On June 1, the minimum wage in British Columbia increased from $11.35 to $12.65 per hour – the first in a series of hikes en route to $15.20 in 2021. That’s a 34 percent increase in three years. Despite claims from Premier John Horgan and others, raising the minimum wage is the wrong way to help B.C.’s working poor.
There’s a better policy option that warrants serious consideration.
To understand why the minimum wage is a bad way to fight poverty, consider that the overwhelming majority of minimum wage earners in B.C. are not poor. In fact, 84.3 percent of B.C. minimum wage earners are not part of a low-income family, as defined by Statistics Canada’s low income cut-off.
This sounds counterintuitive, but makes sense once you realize that minimum wage earners tend not to be the primary or sole earners in their families. Instead, they’re mostly inexperienced teenagers or young adults working part time while in school, living at home with parents. In B.C., 55.7 percent of all minimum wage earners are between the ages of 15 and 24, and more than three-quarters of these young people live with family.
It’s a similar story for many older minimum wage earners in B.C. – 22.2 percent have an employed spouse who typically earns more than the minimum wage or is self-employed.
Thankfully, the image often portrayed of a single parent struggling to support a family on minimum wage is quite rare. Only 2.0 percent of minimum wage earners in Canada are single parents with young kids.
So the evidence clearly shows that raising the minimum wage doesn’t effectively target benefits to the group we should all want to help: the working poor.
And there’s another problem. A higher minimum wage makes it harder for young and inexperienced workers to find work. Just as consumers purchase less of something if its price rises (with no corresponding increase in quality), employers often respond to minimum wage hikes by purchasing less labour.
The consensus finding in Canadian academic research is that minimum wage increases predominantly reduce employment for young people. Typically, a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage results in a three to six percent reduction in youth employment.
In addition to reducing and/or not creating new jobs, employers respond to minimum wage increases in other ways – for instance, by cutting back hours or fringe benefits such as on-the-job training. They may also shift their production inputs towards more capital, perhaps automating job functions. Or they may pass along the increased labour costs to their customers through higher prices – perversely hurting the poor, who are least able to absorb the higher costs.
Fortunately, a better policy option provides targeted benefits to those in need without producing the same negative economic consequences. A work-based subsidy, in the vein of the Canada Workers Benefit, a federal program, is worthy of consideration.
Under such a program, the government tops up the wages of workers with household incomes below a determined threshold, through a cash subsidy. The crucial advantage of a work-based subsidy is that it more efficiently increases the income of the working poor without making it harder for employers to hire less-skilled workers.
If the provincial government truly wants to help B.C.’s working poor, it should heed the lessons from evidence-based research, abandon its planned minimum wage increases and instead consider a work-based subsidy program that actually targets benefits to those in need.
Charles Lammam and Hugh MacIntyre are co-authors of the Fraser Institute study “Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia: A Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy,” available at www.fraserinstitute.org
The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.