This essay discusses the relationship between man and his environment. It focuses on the limits imposed by our technological capabilities and social structure on the environment’s ability to meet our current and future help. This essay writer also examines Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and the deep ecology theory.
Relationship between man and nature
The relationship between man and nature is complicated and has several conflicting aspects. It can be either a source of resources or a threat. As a man grows and develops, he becomes less dependent on nature directly. However, he continues to rely on nature indirectly, transforming it and increasing his power over it. In the process, he becomes increasingly more in contact with nature and brings ever-increasing quantities of matter, energy, and information into his sphere of activity.
While man has greatly influenced nature, it has remained essential for human existence. Man is a remarkably complex creature, a supernatural being in some ways. As a result, he has changed nature and incorporated his characteristics for essay writing services. As a result, the spirit will continue to be an essential source of human well-being.
Limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment’s ability to meet present and future needs
The limits imposed by the state of engineering science and social organization on the ecological’s ability to meet present and future human needs are a matter of profound moral and ethical significance. In the case of the earth’s natural resources, over-exploitation can cause a severe decline in living standards in some regions, and a lack of sustainable development can cause severe social and economic problems. In these situations, the balance between demographics and ecosystems must be restored. It must be done while keeping in mind the underlying principles of sustainability.
To achieve this, governments in all countries must promote an intelligent growth policy, which involves aligning economic systems with the regeneration capacity of the environment. It requires adopting appropriate production and consumption practices and applicable taxation and subsidy policies. In addition, these policies must include enforcement of the polluter-pays principle, which requires polluters to bear pollution costs.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
Frankenstein is a novel about the relationship between a creator and his creation. Victor Frankenstein was fascinated by science and wanted to create life. The relationship between Victor and his design was similar to that of a father and son. Both wanted knowledge and family.
While Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein may seem a bit restricting to some readers, she does not mean it’s uninformed. On the contrary, she considers it educational, informative, and instructive to write my essay for me. It aims to challenge our assumptions about man and his environment.
Frankenstein is a classic example of an allegory about the human condition. The character of Victor Frankenstein suffers because he is obsessed with the invention. It sacrifices his health and rests in pursuit of his creation. And he loses his soul in the process.
Naess’s deep ecology
The environmental movement does not widely support Naess’s deep ecology as a product of man’s environment. Although sympathetic to Naess’s eight-point platform, many environmental writers reject it as counterproductive. However, it has become a rallying cry for opponents of sociotheoretical critiques of deep ecology.
It is essential to recognize that Naess’s work could be more straightforward. It requires multiple readings to grasp all its complexities. But once you do, you’ll be richly rewarded. The book is not suitable for children.
Deep ecology has some exciting aspects. It is an environmental philosophy and social movement that addresses ecological and feminist concerns. It has religious undertones. It was developed in 1972 by Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess. Naess developed a platform of eight organizing principles that explain the beliefs of deep ecologists. These principles include:
Human exploitation of nature
Human exploitation of nature is a complex problem with both human and environmental consequences. Resource exploitation often leads to ecosystems’ degradation, and human activity disrupts the natural cycle. In addition, biodiversity is often overlooked in the quest for profit, with its value often ignored in favor of economic gains. The problem is a composition of the fact that poor people and ecosystems are often left behind.
This content is a joint venture between our publication and our partner. We do not endorse any product or service in the article.